Re: [PATCH] remove dead code in via-pmu68k

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
When suspend is ever implemented for pmu68k it really should follow the
generic pm_ops concept and not mirror the platform-specific /dev/pmu
device with ioctls on it. Hence, this patch removes the unused code there;
should the implementors need it they can look at via-pmu.c and/or the
history of the file.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Please consider for .23. And which is the correct mailing list?

It's in my queue (which I will send out when I find some spare time).

linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(which is currently an alias for linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux