Re: [PATCH 1/9] mfd: Add driver for Photonicat power management MCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/9/6 17:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/09/2024 11:36, Junhao Xie wrote:
>> Add a driver for Photonicat power management MCU, which
[...]>> +void *pcat_data_get_data(struct pcat_data *data)
>> +{
>> +	if (!data)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	return data->data;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcat_data_get_data);
> 
> You need kerneldoc... or just drop it. Looks a bit useless as an
> export... Is it because you want to hide from your own driver pcat_data?
> What for? It's your driver...

Now struct pcat_data is in mfd-photonicat.c,
I will move it to photonicat-pmu.h and remove pcat_data_get_data.

> 
[...]
>> +void pcat_pmu_unregister_notify(struct pcat_pmu *pmu, struct notifier_block *nb)
> 
> You need kerneldoc.

I will add missing kernel documentation for all exported functions.

> 
[...]
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id pcat_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "ariaboard,photonicat-pmu", },
> 
> Undocumented compatible.
> 
> Remember about correct order of patches. ABI documentation is before users.
> 

I will adjust order of patches.

> 
[...]
>> +
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:photonicat-pmu");
> 
> You should not need MODULE_ALIAS() in normal cases. If you need it,
> usually it means your device ID table is wrong (e.g. misses either
> entries or MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()). MODULE_ALIAS() is not a substitute
> for incomplete ID table.
> 
> And it is not even correct. This is not a platform driver!
> 

Yes, I will remove MODULE_ALIAS line

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Thanks for your review, I will fix all problems in next version!

Best regards,
Junhao




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux