On Mon, 05 Aug 2024, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 05 Aug 2024 16:49:45 +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: > > The iterated nodes are direct children of the device node, and the > > `device_for_each_child_node()` macro accounts for child node > > availability. > > > > `fwnode_for_each_available_child_node()` is meant to access the child > > nodes of an fwnode, and therefore not direct child nodes of the device > > node. > > > > [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [2/4] leds: pca995x: use device_for_each_child_node() to access device child nodes > commit: 6eefd65ba6ae29ab801f6461e59c10f93dd496f8 I'm not sure what you rebased onto, but it wasn't LEDs or -next. Anyway, I fixed-up the conflicts and pushed. The patch should be in -next by tomorrow. Please check it to ensure I didn't make any mistakes. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
