Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: mvpp2: use device_for_each_child_node() to access device child nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> Apart from that, there is a suspicious check towards the end of the same
> function:
> 
>  if (is_acpi_node(port_fwnode))
> 		return;
> 
> At the point it is called in the current implementation, port_fwnode
> could have been cleaned. And after removing the loop, it is simply
> uninitialized. Was that meant to be pdev->dev->fwnode?

If you're referring to the one before the clk_disable_unprepare() calls,
it's only slightly suspicious:

These clocks are setup in a:

        if (dev_of_node(&pdev->dev)) {
		...
	}

block, so they're only setup if we have device tree. So, avoiding it
for ACPI is entirely reasonable. However, we also have software nodes
as well, so the test should be:

	if (!dev_of_node(&pdev->dev))
		return;

to match what the probe function is doing.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux