On Sat, 06 Jul 2024 17:23:35 +0200
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The iterated nodes are direct children of the device node, and the
> `device_for_each_child_node()` macro accounts for child node
> availability.
>
> `fwnode_for_each_available_child_node()` is meant to access the child
> nodes of an fwnode, and therefore not direct child nodes of the device
> node.
>
> Use `device_for_each_child_node()` to indicate device's direct child
> nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>
Why not the scoped variant?
There look to be two error paths in there which would be simplified.
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-bd2606mvv.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-bd2606mvv.c b/drivers/leds/leds-bd2606mvv.c
> index 3fda712d2f80..4f38b7b4d9d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-bd2606mvv.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-bd2606mvv.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config bd2606mvv_regmap = {
>
> static int bd2606mvv_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> - struct fwnode_handle *np, *child;
> + struct fwnode_handle *child;
> struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> struct bd2606mvv_priv *priv;
> struct fwnode_handle *led_fwnodes[BD2606_MAX_LEDS] = { 0 };
> @@ -77,8 +77,7 @@ static int bd2606mvv_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> int err, reg;
> int i;
>
> - np = dev_fwnode(dev);
> - if (!np)
> + if (!dev_fwnode(dev))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ static int bd2606mvv_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, priv);
>
> - fwnode_for_each_available_child_node(np, child) {
> + device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> struct bd2606mvv_led *led;
>
> err = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®);
>
