Other warnings refer to the name after renaming, which is clearer when
that name is mentioned first.
It is also clearer where "ret" comes from.
While at it, also add the necessary newline to the message and fix the
parameter alignment.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/leds/led-class.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
index 24fcff682b24..c298355d5b7d 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
@@ -503,6 +503,9 @@ int led_classdev_register_ext(struct device *parent,
ret = led_classdev_next_name(proposed_name, final_name, sizeof(final_name));
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ else if (ret)
+ dev_warn(parent, "Led %s renamed to %s due to name collision\n",
+ proposed_name, final_name);
if (led_cdev->color >= LED_COLOR_ID_MAX)
dev_warn(parent, "LED %s color identifier out of range\n", final_name);
@@ -518,10 +521,6 @@ int led_classdev_register_ext(struct device *parent,
if (init_data && init_data->fwnode)
device_set_node(led_cdev->dev, init_data->fwnode);
- if (ret)
- dev_warn(parent, "Led %s renamed to %s due to name collision",
- proposed_name, dev_name(led_cdev->dev));
-
if (led_cdev->flags & LED_BRIGHT_HW_CHANGED) {
ret = led_add_brightness_hw_changed(led_cdev);
if (ret) {
--
2.45.1
