On Tue, 23 Apr 2024, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 23.04.24 11:06, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 11:00 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten > > Leemhuis) wrote: > >> On 16.04.24 08:17, Johannes Berg wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 13:37 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Johannes, you had another suggestion: changing iwlwifi's request_module() to request_module_nowait() in > >>>> iwl_req_fw_callback() > >>>> > >>>> Is that still best thing to try in your opinion? > >>> > >>> I guess so, I don't have any better ideas so far anyway ... > >> > >> [adding the iwlwifi maintainer; thread starts here: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/30f757e3-73c5-5473-c1f8-328bab98fd7d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > >> > >> ] > >> > >> Johannes, Miri, what's the status wrt to this regression? From here > >> things look somewhat stalled -- but maybe there was progress and I just > >> missed it. > > > > What do you want? It got bisected to an LED merge, but you ping _us_? > > Way to go ... > > Sorry, to me it sounded a bit like you had an idea for a fix and were > going to give it a try -- similar to how the maintainers for a r8169 > driver and the igc driver provided fixes for bugs recent LED changes > exposed. > > But sure, you are right, in the end some LED change seems to have cause > this, so the duty to fix it lies in that field. Therefore: > > Lee, what's the status here to get this fixed before the final? No idea. Did you send a fix? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
