Hello Lee
On 3/22/24 13:43, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, George Stark wrote:
Hello Lee
On 3/21/24 21:11, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, George Stark wrote:
This patch series fixes the problem of devm_led_classdev_register misusing.
The basic problem is described in [1]. Shortly when devm_led_classdev_register()
is used then led_classdev_unregister() called after driver's remove() callback.
led_classdev_unregister() calls driver's brightness_set callback and that callback
may use resources which were destroyed already in driver's remove().
After discussion with maintainers [2] [3] we decided:
1) don't touch led subsystem core code and don't remove led_set_brightness() from it
but fix drivers
2) don't use devm_led_classdev_unregister
So the solution is to use devm wrappers for all resources
driver's brightness_set() depends on. And introduce dedicated devm wrapper
for mutex as it's often used resource.
...
locking/mutex: introduce devm_mutex_init()
leds: aw2013: use devm API to cleanup module's resources
leds: aw200xx: use devm API to cleanup module's resources
leds: lp3952: use devm API to cleanup module's resources
leds: lm3532: use devm API to cleanup module's resources
leds: nic78bx: use devm API to cleanup module's resources
leds: mlxreg: use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization
leds: an30259a: use devm_mutex_init() for mutex initialization
drivers/leds/leds-an30259a.c | 14 ++++----------
drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
drivers/leds/leds-lm3532.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c | 14 +++++---------
drivers/leds/leds-nic78bx.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
include/linux/mutex.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 11 +++++++++++
9 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Doesn't apply to v6.8.
What base was used for this?
I've just pulled git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
and v7 was applied cleanly. linux-next is ok too.
v6.8 is lack of recent patch 6969d0a2ba1adc9ba6a49b9805f24080896c255c
v7's patch #2 depends on it
No problem. I'll wait for v6.9-rc1.
Just checked the v7 patch series on released 6.9-rc1 and it's applied
cleanly. If anything i can help please let me know.
--
Best regards
George
