Hello Pavel, On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 12:21:48AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > This led-controller supports 3 pattern controllers for auto breathing or > > > group dimming control. Each pattern controller can work in auto > > > breathing or manual control mode. All breathing parameters including > > > rising/falling slope, on/off time, repeat times, min/max brightness > > > and so on are configurable. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../testing/sysfs-class-led-driver-aw200xx | 108 +++ > > > Documentation/leds/leds-aw200xx.rst | 274 ++++++++ > > > drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c | 649 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 1031 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/leds/leds-aw200xx.rst > > > > This interface is bananas. Exposing an entire register interface to > > sysfs does not sit will with me at all. When we add support to a sysfs > > class, we usually require it to be generic and work across all devices. > > Adding device specific interfaces is generally decried and to be > > avoided. Don't forget, once we commit something to sysfs, it becomes > > ABI and we have to support it forever. > > If you do git grep hw_pattern, you should get pointers to qcom-lpg > driver that solves similar problem, with interface that should be > acceptable. Thank you for pointing that out. Yes, it's a very similar situation to ours. But I haven't observed the merging of this driver. Was it encountering similar issues with the sysfs interface? -- Thank you, Dmitry