Re: [PATCH] leds: sun50i-a100: avoid division-by-zero warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 02:26, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 5:45 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  {
>>         const struct sun50i_a100_ledc_timing *timing = &priv->timing;
>>         unsigned long mod_freq = clk_get_rate(priv->mod_clk);
>> -       u32 cycle_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / mod_freq;
>> +       u32 cycle_ns;
>>         u32 control;
>>
>> +       if (!mod_freq)
>> +               return;
>> +
> Shall we need err_disable_bus_clk?
>
> + static int sun50i_a100_ledc_set_timing(struct sun50i_a100_ledc *priv)
> - static void sun50i_a100_ledc_set_timing(struct sun50i_a100_ledc *priv)

I'm not worried about it too much, as there is already an error check
on priv->mod_clk being unavailable during initialization. The case that
the warning is about is just for build-testing on architectures that
don't even use COMMON_CLK.

     Arnd





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux