On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:05:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:53:55 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote: > > Soo that it's problematic to also have on net-next? (Sorry for the > > stupid question) > > Unless I pull from Lee the patch would be duplicated, we'd have two > commits with different hashes and the same diff. And if I pull we'd > get a lot of netdev-unrelated stuff into net-next: > Thanks for the explaination... Sad... guess I have to wait, hoped I could have the qca808x series before proposing the at803x driver split but I guess it's not possible... Maybe I can try pushing the change for link_1000 for now and later add link_2500 ? > $ git merge f07894d3b384344c43be1bcf61ef8e2fded0efe5 > Auto-merging drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c > Merge made by the 'ort' strategy. > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev | 39 ++ > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-tty | 56 ++ > .../bindings/leds/allwinner,sun50i-a100-ledc.yaml | 137 +++++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml | 2 +- > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 21 + > drivers/leds/Makefile | 2 + > drivers/leds/leds-max5970.c | 109 ++++ > drivers/leds/leds-sun50i-a100.c | 580 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/leds/leds-syscon.c | 3 +- > drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c | 30 +- > drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c | 52 +- > drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-gpio.c | 26 +- > drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 32 +- > drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-tty.c | 247 +++++++-- > drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 28 +- > include/linux/leds.h | 3 + > include/linux/tty.h | 1 + > 17 files changed, 1247 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/allwinner,sun50i-a100-ledc.yaml > create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-max5970.c > create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-sun50i-a100.c -- Ansuel