On 2023-12-06 14:47, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 01 Dec 2023, Florian Eckert wrote:
On 2023-12-01 11:40, Lee Jones wrote:
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/6] tty: add new helper function tty_get_tiocm
> commit: 5d11a4709f552fa139c2439fead05daeb064a6f4
> [2/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: free allocated ttyname buffer on deactivate
> (no commit info)
> [3/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: change logging if get icount failed
> (no commit info)
> [4/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: replace mutex with completion
> (no commit info)
> [5/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: make rx tx activitate configurable
> (no commit info)
> [6/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: add additional line state evaluation
> (no commit info)
I think that was a mistake? Patchset v9 is the correct patchset [1]?
Thanks for applying v9 [1]
It's automated. Not sure what happened now.
Please check to ensure the correct set was applied.
I have checked that v9 is appled to the branch for-leds-next [1].
I can confirm that v9 patchset is applied there.
Thanks
Best regards
Florian
Links:
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git/log/?h=for-leds-next
