Re: [PATCH 0/8] devm_led_classdev_register() usage problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Andy

Could you please take a look at this patch series?

I've just found your post on habr about devres API misusing and I think this is just another case.

On 10/25/23 16:07, George Stark wrote:
Lots of drivers use devm_led_classdev_register() to register their led objects
and let the kernel free those leds at the driver's remove stage.
It can lead to a problem due to led_classdev_unregister()
implementation calls led_set_brightness() to turn off the led.
led_set_brightness() may call one of the module's brightness_set callbacks.
If that callback uses module's resources allocated without using devm funcs()
then those resources will be already freed at module's remove() callback and
we may have use-after-free situation.

Here is an example:

module_probe()
{
     devm_led_classdev_register(module_brightness_set_cb);
     mutex_init(&mutex);
}

module_brightness_set_cb()
{
     mutex_lock(&mutex);
     do_set_brightness();
     mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}

module_remove()
{
     mutex_destroy(&mutex);
}

at rmmod:
module_remove()
     ->mutex_destroy(&mutex);
devres_release_all()
     ->led_classdev_unregister();
         ->led_set_brightness();
             ->module_brightness_set_cb();
                  ->mutex_lock(&mutex);  /* use-after-free */

I think it's an architectural issue and should be discussed thoroughly.
Some thoughts about fixing it as a start:
1) drivers can use devm_led_classdev_unregister() to explicitly free leds before
dependend resources are freed. devm_led_classdev_register() remains being useful
to simplify probe implementation.
As a proof of concept I examined all drivers from drivers/leds and prepared
patches where it's needed. Sometimes it was not as clean as just calling
devm_led_classdev_unregister() because several drivers do not track
their leds object at all - they can call devm_led_classdev_register() and drop the
returned pointer. In that case I used devres group API.

Drivers outside drivers/leds should be checked too after discussion.

2) remove led_set_brightness from led_classdev_unregister() and force the drivers
to turn leds off at shutdown. May be add check that led's brightness is 0
at led_classdev_unregister() and put a warning to dmesg if it's not.
Actually in many cases it doesn't really need to turn off the leds manually one-by-one
if driver shutdowns whole led controller. For the last case to disable the warning
new flag can be brought in e.g LED_AUTO_OFF_AT_SHUTDOWN (similar to LED_RETAIN_AT_SHUTDOWN).

George Stark (8):
   leds: powernv: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: nic78bx: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: an30259a: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: mlxreg: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: aw200xx: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: aw2013: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: lp3952: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown
   leds: lm3532: explicitly unregister LEDs at module's shutdown

  drivers/leds/leds-an30259a.c |  4 ++++
  drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c  |  4 ++++
  drivers/leds/leds-aw2013.c   |  4 ++++
  drivers/leds/leds-lm3532.c   |  6 ++++++
  drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c   |  5 +++++
  drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c   | 12 +++++++++++-
  drivers/leds/leds-nic78bx.c  |  4 ++++
  drivers/leds/leds-powernv.c  |  7 +++++++
  8 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


--
Best regards
George



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux