On 7.09.2023 22:26, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 7.09.2023 21:54, Anjelique Melendez wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/30/2023 11:34 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 30.08.2023 20:06, Anjelique Melendez wrote:
>>>> Update the pmi632 lpg_data struct so that pmi632 devices use PPG
>>>> for LUT pattern.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anjelique Melendez <quic_amelende@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>>>> index 90dc27d5eb7c..0b37d3b539f8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
>>>> @@ -1672,11 +1672,14 @@ static const struct lpg_data pm8994_lpg_data = {
>>>> static const struct lpg_data pmi632_lpg_data = {
>>>> .triled_base = 0xd000,
>>>>
>>>> + .lut_size = 64,
>>>> + .lut_sdam_base = 0x80,
>>> Is that a predefined space for use with LPG?
>>>
>>> Or can it be reclaimed for something else?
>>>
>>> Konrad
>> Yes, this is a predefined space for use with LPG
> We represent the SDAM as a NVMEM device, generally it would
> be nice to add all regions within it as subnodes in the devicetree.
Wait hmm.. we already get it as a nvmem cell.. Or at least that's
how I understand it (lut_sdam_base == lpg_chan_nvmem->start, pseudocode)
Why don't we access it through the nvmem r/w ops then?
Konrad
>
> Krzysztof, opinions?
>
> Konrad
