Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] dt-bindings: leds: leds-mt6323: Support WLED output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 02/06/23 10:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
On 01/06/2023 13:08, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Some PMICs have a separated WLED string output: add a property
`mediatek,is-wled` to indicate which LED string is a WLED.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6323.txt | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6323.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6323.txt
index 052dccb8f2ce..904b2222a5fe 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6323.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-mt6323.txt
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Optional properties for the LED child node:
  - label : See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
  - linux,default-trigger : See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
  - default-state: See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
+- mediatek,is-wled: LED string is connected to WLED output

Why would it matter to what the output is connected to?

When this property is present, the MT6323 LEDs are managed through different
hardware registers which are specific to WLEDs: if we have no indication of
whether this is a WLED or a LED, we would program the wrong registers.

P.S.: Sorry for the very late reply


Best regards,
Krzysztof







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux