On 22.05.23 10:17, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 17.04.23 13:25, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> [adding Matthias to the list of recipients, who back then applied to >> culprit] >> >> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting >> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone. >> >> AngeloGioacchino, Has any progress been made to fix below regression? It >> doesn't look like it from here, hence I wondered if it fall through the >> cracks. > > Hmmm, nobody replied. Does nobody (including the reporters!) care > anymore for valid reasons? Then I'd drop this from the tracking. #regzbot inconclusive: it seems nobody (including the reporters) does care anymore #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. > Or was progress made and I just missed it? > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > >> On 27.03.23 10:23, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >>> Il 26/03/23 15:23, Bagas Sanjaya ha scritto: >>>> On 3/26/23 02:20, Tobias Dahms wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> the bisection gives following result: >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 18c7deca2b812537aa4d928900e208710f1300aa is the first bad commit >>>>> commit 18c7deca2b812537aa4d928900e208710f1300aa >>>>> Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >>>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Tue May 17 12:47:08 2022 +0200 >>>>> >>>>> soc: mediatek: pwrap: Use readx_poll_timeout() instead of custom >>>>> function >>>>> >>>>> Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address >>>>> through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that >>>>> the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do. >>>>> Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead >>>>> use the read_poll_timeout macro. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >>>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Link: >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517104712.24579-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++---------------- >>>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK, I'm updating the regression status: >>>> >>>> #regzbot introduced: 18c7deca2b8125 >>>> >>>> And for replying, don't top-post, but rather reply inline with >>>> appropriate context instead; hence I cut the replied context. >>>> >>> >>> There are two possible solutions to that, specifically, either: >>> 1. Change readx_poll_timeout() to readx_poll_timeout_atomic(); or >>> 2. Fix the mt6323-led driver so that this operation gets done >>> out of atomic context, which is IMO the option to prefer. >>> >>> Ideas? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Angelo >>> >>>
