On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:33:25PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:15:30AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > > > This is a continue of [1]. It was decided to take a more gradual > > > approach to implement LEDs support for switch and phy starting with > > > basic support and then implementing the hw control part when we have all > > > the prereq done. > > > > I tried to apply this series to give it a try. To what tree should this > > series be applied upon? > > > > Hi, > since this feature affect multiple branch, the prereq of this branch are > still not in linux-next. (the prereq series got accepted but still has > to be merged) > > Lee created a branch. Ok, this explains it, thanks. > > We are waiting for RC stage to request a stable branch so we can > reference ti to correctly test this. > > Anyway you should be able to apply this series on top of this branch [1] > > Consider that a v2 is almost ready with some crucial changes that should > improve the implementation. (so if you are planning on adding support > for other device I advice to check also v2, just an additional ops to > implement) I'll wait for v2 then. My ultimate goal is to implement LED trigger support for the DP83867 phy. It would be great if you could Cc me on v2 so I get a trigger once it's out. Thanks for working on this topic. It pops up here every once in a while and it would be good to get it solved. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
