On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 14:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 13:42, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > > > > > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends > > > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for > > > > those drivers using them. > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > > > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Applied, thanks > > > > Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series > > this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be > > missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this, > > either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional > > patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove > > inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset. > > It's probably too late now to squeeze patch 1 into linux-6.3 > as a late preparation patch for the rest of the series in 6.4. > > It would be good if you could respin that patch separately > anyway, so I can add it to the asm-generic tree and make > sure we get it ready for the next merge window. > > Arnd Yes, sorry I was traveling Thursday to Monday and then spent some time catching up and investigating an internal issue. I'm currently going through the patches one by one incorporating comments. I fear the split of the USB patch as well as the suggestions for video might take a bit of time, so if you prefer I could also send just an updated patch 1 separately. How would I do this cleanly? Send as v4 without(?) a cover letter and add a Note after the '---'? Thanks, Niklas
