On 03. 03. 23, 15:11, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Florian Eckert wrote:
@@ -113,21 +207,38 @@ static void ledtrig_tty_work(struct work_struct *work)
trigger_data->tty = tty;
}
- ret = tty_get_icount(trigger_data->tty, &icount);
- if (ret) {
- dev_info(trigger_data->tty->dev, "Failed to get icount, stopped polling\n");
- mutex_unlock(&trigger_data->mutex);
- return;
- }
-
- if (icount.rx != trigger_data->rx ||
- icount.tx != trigger_data->tx) {
- led_set_brightness_sync(trigger_data->led_cdev, LED_ON);
-
- trigger_data->rx = icount.rx;
- trigger_data->tx = icount.tx;
- } else {
- led_set_brightness_sync(trigger_data->led_cdev, LED_OFF);
+ switch (trigger_data->mode) {
+ case TTY_LED_CTS:
+ ledtrig_tty_flags(trigger_data, TIOCM_CTS);
+ break;
+ case TTY_LED_DSR:
+ ledtrig_tty_flags(trigger_data, TIOCM_DSR);
+ break;
+ case TTY_LED_CAR:
+ ledtrig_tty_flags(trigger_data, TIOCM_CAR);
+ break;
+ case TTY_LED_RNG:
+ ledtrig_tty_flags(trigger_data, TIOCM_RNG);
+ break;
+ case TTY_LED_CNT:
I believe this requires a 'fall-through' statement.
I don't think this is the case. Isn't fallthrough required only in cases
when there is at least one statement, i.e. a block?
Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
+ default:
+ ret = tty_get_icount(trigger_data->tty, &icount);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_info(trigger_data->tty->dev, "Failed to get icount, stopped polling\n");
+ mutex_unlock(&trigger_data->mutex);
+ return;
+ }
+
--
js
