On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:54PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 10:57:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 10:18:33AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 04:21:37PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: ... > > > > I'm wondering why we didn't see a compiler warning about mistyped function > > > > prototypes in some drivers. > > > > > > I don't understand where you expected a warning. Care to elaborate? > > > > intel-lpss.c has the prototype that returns an int. IIRC it was like this > > Do you mean drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c? That one doesn't implement a PWM?! Nope, I meant pwm-lpss.c. > And drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c is adapted by this series. That's what I didn't see how. > One of us is confused ... Yes, because when I have checked the branch based on Linux Next I already saw that get_state() returns a code and I wasn't aware that the series is already there. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko