Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] leds: deduplicate led_init_default_state_get()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:11:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:53:49AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:49:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > There are several users of LED framework that reimplement the
> > > > > > > functionality of led_init_default_state_get(). In order to
> > > > > > > deduplicate them move the declaration to the global header
> > > > > > > (patch 2) and convert users (patche 3-11).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Dear LED maintainers, is there any news on this series? It's hanging around
> > > > > > for almost 2 months now...
> > > > > 
> > > > > My offer still stands if help is required.
> > > > 
> > > > From my point of view the LED subsystem is quite laggish lately (as shown by
> > > > this patch series, for instance), which means that _in practice_ the help is
> > > > needed, but I haven't got if we have any administrative agreement on that.
> > > > 
> > > > Pavel?
> > > 
> > > So, Pavel seems quite unresponsive lately... Shall we just move on and take
> > > maintainership?
> > 
> > I had an off-line conversation with Greg who advised me against that.
> 
> OK. What the reasonable option we have then?

I thought there is now a new LED maintainer, is that not working out?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux