On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Pavel, Marek, > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > This drops the last uses of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child() > > from the tree and drops the stubs implementing this API on top of > > devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(). > > > > Note that the bulk of users were converted in 2019, the couple of LED > > drivers are all that have remained. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > Dmitry Torokhov (3): > > leds: gpio: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() > > leds: lgm-sso: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() > > gpiolib: remove devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child() > > > > drivers/leds/blink/leds-lgm-sso.c | 5 ++--- > > drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 5 ++--- > > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 21 --------------------- > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > --- > > base-commit: 7fd22855300e693668c3397771b3a2b3948f827a > > change-id: 20220902-get_gpiod_from_child-remove-a62638849e91 > > > > Could you please consider picking this up for 6.1? Or would you be OK > with this going through other tree (GPIO maybe)? *ping* Could this go through GPIO tree? Dropping this API helps with some outstanding work that I have... Thanks. -- Dmitry
