Re: [PATCH v12 3/5] iio: adc: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Sep 2022, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:46 AM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Sep 2022, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:51:24 +0800
> > > ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > MediaTek MT6370 is a SubPMIC consisting of a single cell battery charger
> > > > with ADC monitoring, RGB LEDs, dual channel flashlight, WLED backlight
> > > > driver, display bias voltage supply, one general purpose LDO, and the
> > > > USB Type-C & PD controller complies with the latest USB Type-C and PD
> > > > standards.
> > > >
> > > > Add support for the MT6370 ADC driver for system monitoring, including
> > > > charger current, voltage, and temperature.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This will have to either wait for next cycle, or go through mfd because
> > > of the dt-bindings include which is in the mfd tree.
> > >
> > > Please make those dependencies clear in new versions.
> >
> > If the bindings come together in -next, then subsequently in Mainline,
> > it shouldn't really matter.
> 
> Except that the bindings haven't come together and at this point may
> not for 6.1. linux-next has been warning for weeks because the child
> device schemas haven't been applied. I've said it before, all the
> schemas for MFD devices need to be applied together. Or at least the
> MFD schema needs to get applied last.
> 
> Furthermore, subsequent versions of this don't get tested and we end
> up with more warnings[1].
> 
> It's only your IIO tree that the DT
> > tooling with complain about, right?
> 
> And the MFD tree...
> 
> Please apply the LED bindings (patches 1 and 2) so we can get the
> existing warnings fixed and address any new warnings.

Who usually applies LED bindings?  Looks as though they're good to go.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux