On 18/07/2022 17:18, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 5:13 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The lp50xx LEDs expects to have single-color LED children with unit
>> addresses. This is required by the driver and provided by existing
>> DTSes. Fix the binding to match actual usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Fixes: dce1452301e7 ("dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers")
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>> index f12fe5b53f30..c274a10bbde6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>> @@ -65,8 +65,14 @@ patternProperties:
>> for the child node. The LED modules can either be used stand alone
>> or grouped into a module bank.
>>
>> + '#address-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#size-cells':
>> + const: 0
>> +
>> patternProperties:
>> - "(^led-[0-9a-f]$|led)":
>> + "^led@[0-9a-f]+$":
>
> Looks like you forgot to update the example. Now failing with
> 'unevaluatedProperties' fixed:
Yeah, this was fixed in my other patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607075247.58048-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
and I assumed Pavel will also pick it up... It has been waiting for more
than one month.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
