Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: leds: common: fix unit address in max77693 example

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > The max77693 LED device node should not take an unit address, because it
> > is instantiated from a max77693 I2C parent device node.  This also
> > splits all examples to separate DTS examples because they are actually
> > independent.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> This should be part of my max77693 patchset:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220111175017.223966-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Nothing actually depends on this patch. It just fixes a warning which
> will be brought to eyes with mentioned max77693 patchset.
> 
> Pavel, feel free to take it separately via leds tree. Other way is to
> take it with other max77693 patches (probably via MFD tree).

Ok, let me take it separately. Applied, thanks.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux