Re: [PATCH v1 08/28] leds: lgm-sso: Put fwnode in any case during ->probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:08 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > @@ -734,10 +736,15 @@ static int sso_led_dt_parse(struct sso_led_priv *priv)
> >       if (fw_ssoled) {
> >               ret = __sso_led_dt_parse(priv, fw_ssoled);
> >               if (ret)
> > -                     return ret;
> > +                     goto err_child_out;
> >       }
> >
> > +     fwnode_handle_put(fw_ssoled);
> >       return 0;
> > +
> > +err_child_out:
> > +     fwnode_handle_put(fw_ssoled);
> > +     return ret;
> >  }
>
> Just delete the return and you get the same effect, no? No need to
> have two exits here.

Okay, I have tried and neither result is better:
option 1. Add ret = 0, but keep the label
option 2. Assign 0 to ret at the definition stage and replace return
with break and remove return 0 (I don't like that ret assigned to 0 in
the definition block. It usually may lead to subtle errors)
option 3+. Something I missed which you see can be done?

Which one do you prefer?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux