Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] leds: rt4505: Add support for Richtek RT4505 flash led controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/20 5:57 AM, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
Hi,

Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年10月28日 週三 上午12:40寫道:

Hi Pavel, ChiYuan,

On 10/27/20 9:29 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add support for RT4505 flash led controller. It can support up to 1.5A
flash current with hardware timeout and low input voltage
protection.

Please use upper-case "LED" everywhere.

This should be 2nd in the series, after DT changes.

Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/leds/Kconfig       |  11 ++
   drivers/leds/Makefile      |   1 +
   drivers/leds/leds-rt4505.c | 397 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   3 files changed, 409 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 drivers/leds/leds-rt4505.c
[...]
+static int rt4505_torch_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *lcdev, enum led_brightness level)
+{

80 columns, where easy.

+    struct rt4505_priv *priv = container_of(lcdev, struct rt4505_priv, flash.led_cdev);
+    u32 val = 0;
+    int ret;
+
+    mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
+
+    if (level != LED_OFF) {
+            ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, RT4505_REG_ILED, RT4505_ITORCH_MASK,
+                                     (level - 1) << RT4505_ITORCH_SHIFT);
+            if (ret)
+                    goto unlock;
+
+            val = RT4505_TORCH_SET;
+    }
+
+    ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, RT4505_REG_ENABLE, RT4505_ENABLE_MASK, val);
+
+unlock:
+    mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
+    return ret;
+}

Why is the locking needed? What will the /sys/class/leds interface
look like on system with your flash?

The locking is needed since this can be called via led_set_brightness()
from any place in the kernel, and especially from triggers.
From this case, It means only led classdev
brihtness_get/brightness_set need to be protected.
I search led_flash_classdev, it only can be controlled via sysfs or V4l2.
Like as described in last mail, flash related operation is protected
by led access_lock and v4l2 framework.
I'll keep the locking only in led classdev brightness_get/brightness_set API.
If I misunderstand something, please help to point out.

Locking have to be used consistently for each access to the resource
being protected with the lock. Otherwise you can end up in a situation
when rt4505_torch_brightness_set and rt4505_flash_brightness_set will
try concurrently alter hardware state. Regardless of how harmful could
it be in case of this particular device it is certainly against
programming rules.

--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux