Hi,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:55:14PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 24.08.2020 17:07, Sebastian Reichel пишет:
> >> +static int a500_battery_get_serial_number(struct a500_battery *bat,
> >> + union power_supply_propval *val)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned int i;
> >> + s32 ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + if (bat->serial[0])
> >> + goto done;
> >> +
> >> + a500_ec_lock(bat->ec_chip);
> >> + for (i = 0; i < BATTERY_SERIAL_LEN / 2; i++) {
> >> + ret = a500_ec_read_locked(bat->ec_chip,
> >> + &ec_data[REG_SERIAL_NUMBER].cmd);
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + bat->serial[0] = '\0';
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + bat->serial[i * 2 + 0] = (ret >> 0) & 0xff;
> >> + bat->serial[i * 2 + 1] = (ret >> 8) & 0xff;
> >> + }
> >> + a500_ec_unlock(bat->ec_chip);
> >> +done:
> >> + val->strval = bat->serial;
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >
> > If battery is swapped, this will keep the old serial.
>
> Hello, Sebastian! The battery isn't hot-swappable on A500, but it also
> should be okay to always re-read the serialno. I'll consider removing
> the caching in the v2, thanks.
I assumed it would be hot-swappable because of a500_battery_get_presence().
If it's not hot-swappable, the caching is fine.
-- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
