On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:51 PM Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> IBM created an implementation of the PCA9552 on a PIC16F
> microcontroller. The I2C device addresses are different from the
> hardware PCA9552, so add a new compatible string and associated
> platform data to be able to probe this device.
...
> pca9550,
> pca9551,
> pca9552,
> + ibm_pca9552,
> pca9553,
I would rather not mix like this, but use alpha order, for example.
It's better to read and see which devices are supported by vendor.
...
> },
> + [ibm_pca9552] = {
> + },
> [pca9553] = {
Ditto.
...
> { "pca9550", pca9550 },
> { "pca9551", pca9551 },
> { "pca9552", pca9552 },
> + { "ibm-pca9552", ibm_pca9552 },
> { "pca9553", pca9553 },
Ditto.
...
> { .compatible = "nxp,pca9550", .data = (void *)pca9550 },
> { .compatible = "nxp,pca9551", .data = (void *)pca9551 },
> { .compatible = "nxp,pca9552", .data = (void *)pca9552 },
> + { .compatible = "ibm,pca9552", .data = (void *)ibm_pca9552 },
> { .compatible = "nxp,pca9553", .data = (void *)pca9553 },
Ditto.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
