Hello Uwe, On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote: >> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See >> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next. >> >> Amazing. But isn't there the same issue with it as this one where this >> would fail to build on 32 bit architecture? > > In theory all these cases are coped for. I didn't see any problems yet, > so I still assume also the 32 bit archs are fine. OK then all is fine. I will drop the patch in V2. Also Uwe i just realized that you sent the original message and also this reply only to me and not to anyone else. Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ? Thank you. Best regards, Martin
