On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:54 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2019-10-14 10:50:06)
> > On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 12:47 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This driver can use the of_device_get_match_data() API to simplify the
> > > code. Replace calls to of_match_device() with this newer API under the
> > > assumption that where it is called will be when we know the device is
> > > backed by a DT node. This nicely avoids referencing the match table when
> > > it is undefined with configurations where CONFIG_OF=n.
> >
> > > + devid = (int)(uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> >
> > > + devid = (int)(uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> >
> > This still leaves it OF-centric.
> > Better to use device_get_match_data().
> >
> > Also, I'm thinking that following may help to clean a lot of the i2c
> > client drivers
> >
> > static inline // perhaps no
> > const void *i2c_device_get_match_data(struct i2c_client *client, const
> > struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > {
> > if (id)
> > return (const void *)id->driver_data;
> > return device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> > }
> >
>
> Looks alright to me. Maybe device_get_match_data() can look at the bus
> and call some bus op if the firmware match isn't present? Then we can
> replace a bunch of these calls with device_get_match_data() and it will
> "do the right thing" regardless of what bus or firmware the device is
> running on.
It will be something ugly like
buses {
#ifdef I2C
&i2c_bus_type,
#endif
...
}
in the code. I won't do this.
See generic_match_buses[] for example.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
