Rob,
On 08/10/2019 14:51, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 07/10/2019 18:15, Rob Herring wrote:
Please send DT bindings to DT list or it's never in my queue. IOW,
send patches to the lists that get_maintainers.pl tells you to.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:45 AM Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@xxxxxx>
wrote:
Add DT binding for led-backlight.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt | 28
+++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt
Please make this a DT schema.
OK.
BTW I used "make dt_binding_check" but had to fix a couple of YAMLs
file to get it to work. Do you have a kernel tree with already all the
YAML files in good shape ? Or do you want me to post the changes to
devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ?
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4c7dfbe7f67a
--- /dev/null
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+led-backlight bindings
+
+This binding is used to describe a basic backlight device made of
LEDs.
+It can also be used to describe a backlight device controlled by
the output of
+a LED driver.
+
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: "led-backlight"
+ - leds: a list of LEDs
'leds' is already used as a node name and mixing is not ideal.
We already have 'flash-leds' in use and with the same definition, so
lets continue that and use 'backlight-leds'.
OK
I am taking that back. I have added of_get_led() and devm_of_get_led()
to the LED core to make it easier to get a LED from the DT. I modeled
the interface like it is done for PWM, PHYs or clocks. The property
containing list/array of phandle is always named the same. To get one
particular PWM/PHY/clock, a identifier (name or integer) must be provided.
So unless there is a strong incentive to do otherwise I's rather keep
this name here.
JJ
+
+Optional properties:
+ - brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. The
levels must be
+ in the range accepted by the underlying LED
devices.
+ This is used to translate a backlight
brightness level
+ into a LED brightness level. If it is not
provided, the
+ identity mapping is used.
+
+ - default-brightness-level: The default brightness level.
You can just assume these 2 get a common schema at some point. So just
need to define any additional constraints if possible.
Maybe we should keep them until such a common schema is written ?
JJ
Rob