Re: [PATCH v9 07/15] leds: lp50xx: Add the LP50XX family of the RGB LED driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jacek

On 9/25/19 4:27 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
Dan,

On 9/25/19 7:46 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:

<big_snip>

+
+static int lp50xx_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
+			     enum led_brightness brightness)
+{
+	struct lp50xx_led *led = container_of(cdev, struct lp50xx_led, led_dev);
+	const struct lp50xx_chip_info *led_chip = led->priv->chip_info;
+	struct led_mc_color_entry *color_data;
+	u8 led_offset, reg_val, reg_color_offset;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&led->priv->lock);
+
+	if (led->ctrl_bank_enabled)
+		reg_val = led_chip->bank_brt_reg;
+	else
+		reg_val = led_chip->led_brightness0_reg +
+			  led->led_number;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(led->priv->regmap, reg_val, brightness);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&led->priv->client->dev,
+			"Cannot write brightness value %d\n", ret);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry(color_data, &led->mc_cdev.color_list, list) {
+		if (color_data->led_color_id == LED_COLOR_ID_RED)
+			reg_color_offset = 0;
+		else if (color_data->led_color_id == LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN)
+			reg_color_offset = 1;
+		else if (color_data->led_color_id == LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE)
+			reg_color_offset = 2;
+		else
+			continue;
This else case is quite erroneous. Sheer continue is just ignoring
serious problem. I'd log the problem and return -EINVAL.
Ack.

Also, you could have a macro for mapping color_id to offset.
If the code needed to do this more then once I could justify a macro.  But this is the only instance of this check.

+
+		if (led->ctrl_bank_enabled) {
+			reg_val = led_chip->bank_mix_reg + reg_color_offset;
+		} else {
+			led_offset = (led->led_number * 3)  + reg_color_offset;
+			reg_val = led_chip->mix_out0_reg + led_offset;
+		}
+
+		ret = regmap_write(led->priv->regmap, reg_val,
+				   color_data->intensity);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&led->priv->client->dev,
+				"Cannot write intensity value %d\n", ret);
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&led->priv->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static enum led_brightness lp50xx_brightness_get(struct led_classdev *cdev)
+{
+	struct lp50xx_led *led = container_of(cdev, struct lp50xx_led, led_dev);
+	const struct lp50xx_chip_info *led_chip = led->priv->chip_info;
+	unsigned int brt_val;
+	u8 reg_val;
+	int ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&led->priv->lock);
+
+	if (led->ctrl_bank_enabled)
+		reg_val = led_chip->bank_brt_reg;
+	else
+		reg_val = led_chip->led_brightness0_reg + led->led_number;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(led->priv->regmap, reg_val, &brt_val);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&led->priv->lock);
+
+	return brt_val;
+}
+
+static int lp50xx_set_banks(struct lp50xx *priv, u32 led_banks[])
+{
+	u8 led_config_lo, led_config_hi;
+	u32 bank_enable_mask = 0;
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->chip_info->num_leds; i++)
+		bank_enable_mask |= (1 << led_banks[i]);
+
+	led_config_lo = (u8)(bank_enable_mask & 0xff);
+	led_config_hi = (u8)(bank_enable_mask >> 8) & 0xff;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, LP50XX_LED_CFG0, led_config_lo);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (led_config_hi)
Now I think that less questionable would be writing led_config_hi always
for devices that have CFG1 register. IOW write led_config_hi also
when it equals 0.

Ack.  I will have to modify the check to only write this for LP5030/36 as those are the only 2 that have the CFG1 register.


+		ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, LP5036_LED_CFG1,
+				   led_config_hi);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int lp50xx_reset(struct lp50xx *priv)
+{
+	if (priv->enable_gpio)
+		return gpiod_direction_output(priv->enable_gpio, 1);
+	else
+		return regmap_write(priv->regmap, priv->chip_info->reset_reg,
+				    LP50XX_SW_RESET);
+}
+
+static int lp50xx_enable_disable(struct lp50xx *priv, u8 enable_disable)
+{
+	return regmap_write(priv->regmap, LP50XX_DEV_CFG0, enable_disable);
+}
+
+static int lp50xx_probe_dt(struct lp50xx *priv)
+{
+	u32 led_banks[LP5036_MAX_LED_MODULES];
+	struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
+	struct fwnode_handle *led_node = NULL;
+	struct led_init_data init_data;
+	struct lp50xx_led *led;
+	int num_colors;
+	u32 color_id;
+	int led_number;
+	size_t i = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	priv->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&priv->client->dev,
+						   "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->enable_gpio)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->enable_gpio);
+		dev_err(&priv->client->dev, "Failed to get enable gpio: %d\n",
+			ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	priv->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&priv->client->dev, "vled");
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->regulator))
+		priv->regulator = NULL;
+
+	device_for_each_child_node(&priv->client->dev, child) {
+		led = &priv->leds[i];
+		if (fwnode_property_present(child, "ti,led-bank")) {
+			ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child,
+							     "ti,led-bank",
+							     NULL, 0);
+			ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child,
+							     "ti,led-bank",
+							     led_banks,
+							     ret);
+
+			priv->num_of_banked_leds = ARRAY_SIZE(led_banks);
+
+			ret = lp50xx_set_banks(priv, led_banks);
+			if (ret) {
+				dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
+					"Cannot setup banked LEDs\n");
+				fwnode_handle_put(child);
+				goto child_out;
+			}
+			led->ctrl_bank_enabled = 1;
+
+		} else {
+			ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg",
+					       &led_number);
Not checking ret val?
Yes it is after the else case.  But I should probably check return for the led-bank

+
+			led->led_number = led_number;
+		}
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
+				"led sourcing property missing\n");
+			fwnode_handle_put(child);
+			goto child_out;
+		}
+

Dan

[...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux