Pavel On 4/30/19 5:01 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2019-04-30 14:17:25, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Document the ramp-up and ramp-down property in the binding. >> Removing the "sec" from the property definition as seconds is >> implied. >> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> >> --- >> >> v3 - No changes added Reviewed-by Rob - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1058759/ >> >> v2 - Fixed commit message as this was not just a modification but adding documentation >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1054504/ >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt | 20 ++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt >> index 86ca786d54fc..adae96c79d39 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt >> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ Required properties: >> >> Optional property: > > "properties". > Ack >> - enable-gpios: A GPIO specifier for hardware enable pin. >> + - ramp-up-ms: Current ramping from one brightness level to >> + the a higher brightness level. >> + Range from 2048 us - 117.44 s >> + - ramp-down-ms: Current ramping from one brightness level to >> + the a lower brightness level. >> + Range from 2048 us - 117.44 s > > Can you use ramp-up/down-us for consistency? Sure I can change it to ramp-up/down-us. I just converted it ramp-up/down-msec to ramp-ramp-up/down-ms. Probably makes more sense anyway with the range actually given is in us. Dan > Pavel >
