Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 (drivers/leds/leds-turris-omnia)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 2019-04-29 18:44:39, Marek Behun wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:37:53 +0200
> Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon 2019-04-29 17:38:42, Marek Behun wrote:
> > > I am sending patch only adding the I2C dep. Theoretically it is
> > > possible that someone uses the same I2C API in their microcontroller on
> > > another architecture.  
> > 
> > Theoretically. But we both now that probability of that is very low,
> > and that likely driver would need other updates, too... right?
> 
> What would be the benefit to add ARM dependency? So that distro
> compilations don't ship the turris_omnia driver unnecesarily?

That, and so that people are not asked "do you want to enable omnia
LEDs?" when they update their kernel on i386.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux