Bump for Rob On 4/12/19 2:34 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > And one more: > > [5] - LED naming patch set v3 > > On 4/11/19 9:48 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> I've collected references to the DT patches we're waiting >> to be reviewed. This is just to make sure that none of them >> will be missed - recent traffic on the linux-leds list >> is a bit heavier. >> >> [0] - draft of LED multi color class - we would especially like >> to get a feedback on the proposed brightness-model DT design >> [1][2] - LM3697 backlight driver rework >> [3][4] - LM36274 backlight driver with regulator support >> >> On 4/5/19 4:28 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> The LM3697 is a single function LED driver. The single function LED >>> driver needs to reside in the LED directory as a dedicated LED driver >>> and not as a MFD device. The device does have common brightness and ramp >>> features and those can be accomodated by a TI LMU framework. >>> >>> The LM3697 dt binding needs to be moved from the ti-lmu.txt and a dedicated >>> LED dt binding needs to be added. The new LM3697 LED dt binding will then >>> reside in the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds directory and follow the >>> current LED and general bindings guidelines. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> > [...] >> [0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=155414072611538&w=2 >> [1] https://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=155447454524411&w=2 >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1058762/ >> [3] https://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=155447624324995&w=2 >> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1058779/ >> > > [5] - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=155405492231039&w=2 >
