Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] Add generic support for composing LED class device name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] Add generic support for composing LED class device name
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:21:57 +0200
Cc: linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, robh@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190331175501.23471-1-jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
References: <20190331175501.23471-1-jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi!

I have not yet gone through the series in great detail.

This will change the userland ABI, right? Now, I understand that old ABI is bad, but
will it break someone's code?

										Pavel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] Add generic support for composing LED class device name
  - From: Jacek Anaszewski

References:
- [PATCH v3 00/25] Add generic support for composing LED class device name
  - From: Jacek Anaszewski

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/25] dt-bindings: leds: Add function and color properties
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] dt-bindings: leds: add DT bindings for max77650
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] dt-bindings: leds: Add LED_FUNCTION definitions
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] Add generic support for composing LED class device name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux