Re: [PATCH v2] leds: fix regression in usbport led trigger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 09:56:52AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 05:29:45PM +0100, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > The patch "usb: simplify usbport trigger" together with "leds: triggers:
> > add device attribute support" caused an regression for the usbport
> > trigger. it will no longer enumerate any active usb hub ports under the
> > "ports" directory in the sysfs class directory, if the usb host drivers
> > are fully initialized before the usbport trigger was loaded.
> > 
> > The reason is that the usbport driver tries to register the sysfs
> > entries during the activate() callback. And this will fail with -2 /
> > ENOENT because the patch "leds: triggers: add device attribute support"
> > made it so that the sysfs "ports" group was only being added after the
> > activate() callback succeeded.
> > 
> > This version of the patch reverts parts of the "usb: simplify usbport
> > trigger" patch and restores usbport trigger's functionality.
> 
> This feels like going backwards, as a driver should not be adding and
> removing sysfs groups, because you race with userspace.  Userspace has
> no idea that the new sysfs files were added or removed, right?

I think this is not an issue as the led trigger core code calls
kobject_uevent_env() when the trigger is set. But I still agree that
there seems to be something "unusual" about the usb led trigger ...

Instead of providing a sysfs-file per port to make said port trigger the
led, I'd prefer a single file that you can use to add and remove ports
from the trigger. With this change the driver can properly benefit from
the attribute handling of the led-trigger core and is more in line with
the other triggers.

> I'll apply this, but this feels like a problem in the led api if the
> above really is true.
> 
> also, please wrap your changelogs at 72 columns, making it easier to
> read.  I did that here for you...

In the mail I received the changelog looked fine (though I didn't check
the actual width).

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux