[PATCH/RFC v2] leds: trigger: Introduce a NETDEV trigger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ben Whitten <ben.whitten@xxxxxxxxx>

The patch was converted to led_blink_oneshot, in doing so we find that the
behaviour has changed. As I dont want to break 'userspace' led behaviour this
patch shouldn't be merged as is. Open to suggestions.

Given an interval of 50ms and heavy throughput, the previous implementation
produced a blink with 100ms period and 50% dutycycle. The led_blink_oneshot
version produces a blink with 140ms period and 57% dutycycle.
I assume a fudge factor on the oneshot delay to bring the period back to 100ms
would be device specific so not suitable.

Kind regards,
Ben Whitten (1):
  leds: trigger: Introduce a NETDEV trigger

 .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev     |  45 ++
 drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig                       |   7 +
 drivers/leds/trigger/Makefile                      |   1 +
 drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c              | 507 +++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 560 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-trigger-netdev
 create mode 100644 drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c

-- 
2.7.4




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux