On 08/31/2017 02:04 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 22:00 +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Hi Cedric, >> >> Thanks for the patch. >> >> On 08/30/2017 01:25 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >>> This should also allow probing to fail when a pca955x chip is not >>> found on a I2C bus. >>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> Andrew, >>> >>> The patch conflicts with your patch : >>> >>> "leds: pca955x: Don't invert requested value in pca955x_gpio_set_value()" >>> >>> and I have chosen to be in sync with the 'for-next' branch of the >>> linux-leds git repo. Depending on the reviews we will have to respin >>> one or the other. >> >> Applied yours as first. >> > > No worries, I'll resend. Thanks. I'll target it for 4.15 anyway (or late 4.14 fix) to give time for the clients to test it and complain if it would cause some serious but non-obvious problems. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski
