Re: [PATCH] Documentation: small fixes for LEDs, hide notes about vibration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > -As a specific example of this use-case, let's look at vibrate feature on
> > -phones. Vibrate function on phones is implemented using PWM pins on SoC or
> > -PMIC. There is a need to activate one shot timer to control the vibrate
> > -feature, to prevent user space crashes leaving the phone in vibrate mode
> > -permanently causing the battery to drain.
> 
> I'm not sure if it is a good idea to remove this description. Users will
> still be able to use transient trigger this way. It has been around for
> five years already and there are users which employ it in this
> particular way [0].

I am. Yes, people were doing that, but no, vibration motor is not a
LED. PWM behaviour is different, for example, motor is likely to stop
at low PWM values. We do not want people to do that.

> Apart from that it's the only documented kernel API for vibrate devices
> AFAICT.

Input subsystem has force-feedback protocol, which is very often just
vibrations. Documentation/input/ff.rst . Nokia N900 phone actually
uses that API.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux