On 03/23/2017 08:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In ACPI world any ID should be carefully chosen and registered
> officially. The discussion [1] as I read it gets to wilful assignment
> an ID for non-existing real DSDT example.
>
> Rafael already told [2] how this device would be enumerated using
> compatible string. To be more precise look at the possible DSDT excerpt
> below:
>
> Device (LDX0) {
> Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
> Name (_DDN, "TI LP3952 compatible led driver")
> ...
> })
>
> Name (_DSD, Package () {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package () {
> Package () {"compatible", "ti,lp3952"},
> ...
> }
> })
>
> Based on above, remove non-official ACPI IDs and enumeration from the
> driver.
>
> Note: currently driver has no compatible strings at all, to make above
> working one should add at least one.
>
> [1] https://e2e.ti.com/support/power_management/led_driver/f/192/t/524926
> [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg67125.html
>
> Cc: Tony Makkiel <tony.makkiel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 1 -
> drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c | 11 -----------
> 2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> index e9ba04dcb7cf..8075d2ebccff 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ config LEDS_LP3952
> tristate "LED Support for TI LP3952 2 channel LED driver"
> depends on LEDS_CLASS
> depends on I2C
> - depends on ACPI
> depends on GPIOLIB
> select REGMAP_I2C
> help
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> index 4847e89883a7..5184436b8905 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp3952.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
> *
> */
>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> @@ -276,19 +275,9 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lp3952_id[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lp3952_id);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static const struct acpi_device_id lp3952_acpi_match[] = {
> - {"TXNW3952", 0},
> - {}
> -};
> -
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, lp3952_acpi_match);
> -#endif
> -
> static struct i2c_driver lp3952_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = LP3952_NAME,
> - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(lp3952_acpi_match),
> },
> .probe = lp3952_probe,
> .remove = lp3952_remove,
>
Both patches 1/2 and 2/2 applied. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
