On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13-02-17 23:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh >> <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017, at 13:44, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Thanks, thinkpad_acpi bits are applied to testing > Thank you, so the Dell bits are waiting for Pali's ack ? > Note the Dell bits have been tested on actual hardware too. This cycle shows a flaw in my understanding of process. I've mistakenly pushed couple of patches without maintainers' review. So, I guess from now on we highly recommend to have a tag from actual maintainer before we are going to proceed. Darren, if you think this is too strong, what would be better approach? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
