On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:41:48PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Rename devm_get_gpiod_from_child() into > devm_fwnode_get_gpiod_from_child() to reflect the fact that this > function is operating on a fwnode object. I believe this is completely pointless rename. Are you planning on adding devm_of_get_gpiod_from_child()? Or devm_acpt_get_gpiod_from_child()? (I sure hope not). Also, on what object? Does it take fwnode as first argument? Or maybe we should call it devm_dev_const_charp_fwnode_get_gpiod_from_child() so we know types of all arguments? Please, no. Thanks. -- Dmitry
