On Fri 2016-12-16 11:56:48, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:14:05AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Well, I was asking if the above snipped looks like valid use. Because > > AFAICT, the "custom fallback" is just dev_err(), see above. Coccinelle > > rules don't help me... > > Its not. Its when you ask for no uevent. Only 2 drivers do this. That was one of two you listed. If that is not valid use, perhaps it should be removed, not annotated? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
