Re: [PATCH V2] leds: pca963x: Add ACPI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tin,

On 11/29/2016 03:47 PM, Tin Huynh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 11/29/2016 11:21 AM, Tin Huynh wrote:
This patch enables ACPI support for leds-pca963x driver.

Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Change from V1:
  -Add CONFIG_ACPI.

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c
index 407eba1..57f11e3 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca963x.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  * or by adding the 'nxp,hw-blink' property to the DTS.
  */

+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
@@ -95,6 +96,17 @@ struct pca963x_chipdef {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pca963x_id);

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id pca963x_acpi_ids[] = {
+   { "PCA9632", pca9633 },
+   { "PCA9633", pca9633 },
+   { "PCA9634", pca9634 },
+   { "PCA9635", pca9635 },
+   { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pca963x_acpi_ids);
+#endif
+
 struct pca963x_led;

 struct pca963x {
@@ -322,7 +334,17 @@ static int pca963x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
    struct pca963x_chipdef *chip;
    int i, err;

-   chip = &pca963x_chipdefs[id->driver_data];
+   if (id) {
+           chip = &pca963x_chipdefs[id->driver_data];
+   } else {
+           const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
+
+           acpi_id = acpi_match_device(ACPI_PTR(pca963x_acpi_ids),
+                                           &client->dev);

What kind of problem did you get while compiling without ACPI_PTR here,
when CONFIG_ACPI is disabled? I also tried this configuration but
nothing wrong happened. Also at first glance I don't see why lack of
ACPI_PTR macro could cause problems.

Grep also doesn't show any call to acpi_match_device
with ACPI_PTR as the first argument in the existing drivers.

Indeed, that is not needed at all.
Sorry about that . The PATCH V1 should work fine both with or without
CONFIG_ACPI.
So V1 should be better . Please ignore PATCH V2

Reapplied V1.

--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux