Hey,
On 20-04-16 11:17, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
Hello again
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Olliver Schinagl <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The devil is in the details :)
:)
Saving mode2 sounds like a good compromise then.
But I still believe that we should limit the lock to ledout. No matter
what we do, we cannot have two leds blinking at different frequencies
on the same chip.
So to save a mutex a little bit, we take the risk that nobody else enables
the blink or if they do, enable it in the same way?
If it saves so much, then I guess its worth the risk I suppose?
Give me a day to go through the chip doc and see if I can find a good
compromise, that at least warranties that the leds that are enable
stay enabled ;)
sure thing. I have read the docs quite a few times for using it directly
via i2c, but yeah I'll wait.
Regards!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
