On 5 April 2016 at 18:37, Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ezequiel, > > On 04/04/2016 10:22 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> >> It's desirable to specify which LEDs are to be blinked on a kernel >> panic. Therefore, introduce a devicetree boolean property to mark >> which LEDs should be treated this way. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >> index 68419843e32f..dd409df9203a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ Optional properties for child nodes: >> property is mandatory for the LEDs in the non-flash >> modes >> (e.g. torch or indicator). >> >> +- panic-blink : Mark this LED to be used by the panic LED trigger. > > > I'd say that 'panic-indicator' would be more informative. > Sure, that looks much better. > Please next time cc also devicetree list and maintainers. > Will do. Thanks for the reviews! -- Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
