On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:04:20AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Sure. ...but you agree that somehow you need a new API call for this, > right? Somehow the PWM regulator needs to be able to say that it > wants the hardware state, not the initial state as specified in the > device tree. Wouldn't the most direct way to do that be to just not specify anything in the DT? If there *is* something in DT but we ignore it that's a bit weird.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
