[PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now that workqueues have been removed from individual drivers and
were replaced with a core-internal workqueue we shouldn't
encourage people to add new workqueues to drivers.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/leds.h | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
index bc1476f..4429887 100644
--- a/include/linux/leds.h
+++ b/include/linux/leds.h
@@ -50,7 +50,10 @@ struct led_classdev {
 #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH	(1 << 23)
 
 	/* Set LED brightness level */
-	/* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
+	/* Must not sleep. If no non-blocking version can be provided
+	 * set brightness_set_blocking only. The LED core will use an
+	 * internal work queue to create a non-blocking version.
+	 */
 	void		(*brightness_set)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
 					  enum led_brightness brightness);
 	/*
-- 
2.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux